|
SEARCH: 
JOIN OUR NEWSLETTER: 
Thought To Ponder Just as we must keep in mind a sharp distinction between the goals of a particular policy and the actual consequences of that policy, so we must keep in mind a sharp distinction between the purpose for which a particular power was created and the purposes for which that power can be used. |
 $4,407,921,149.06
Recent Comments
Economic freedom on the decline worldwide; The Bahamas ranked 40th overall
19 September 2011
Economic Freedom of the World
NASSAU N.P. BAHAMAS — THE BAHAMAS is ranked 40th in the Economic Freedom of the World: 2011 Annual Report, released today by The Nassau Institute. The apparent improvement in the ranking is due in part to the relative decline of freedom in the other 140 countries. It is notable that economic freedom for the Bahamas is not worsening as is the case for many other countries in the index. Overall, levels of economic freedom decreased around the globe. This year’s report shows that the average economic freedom score fell to 6.64 in 2009, the lowest in nearly three decades, from 6.67 in 2008. “In response to the American and European debt crises, governments around the world are embracing perverse regulations and this has huge, negative implications for economic freedom and financial recovery,” said Joan Thompson, President, The Nassau Institute. Hong Kong again ranked number one for economic freedom, followed by Singapore and New Zealand. The United States experienced one of the largest drops in economic freedom, falling to 10th place overall from sixth in 2010. Much of this decline is a result of higher spending and borrowing on the part of the U.S. government, and lower scores for legal structure and property rights. Zimbabwe once again received the worst score among the 141 jurisdictions included in the study, followed by Myanmar, Venezuela, and Angola. “The link between economic freedom and prosperity is undeniable: the countries that score highly in terms of economic freedom also offer their people the best quality of life,” said Joan Thompson. “The political uprisings sweeping across the Arab World are the result of people wanting the outcomes of economic freedom – prosperity, job growth, political freedoms, and poverty reduction.” The annual peer-reviewed Economic Freedom of the World report is produced by the Fraser Institute, Canada’s leading public policy think-tank, in cooperation with independent institutes in 85 nations and territories. The Economic Freedom of the World report uses 42 different measures to create an index ranking countries around the world based on policies that encourage economic freedom. The cornerstones of economic freedom are personal choice, voluntary exchange, freedom to compete, and security of private property. Economic freedom is measured in five different areas: (1) size of government, (2) legal structure and security of property rights, (3) access to sound money, (4) freedom to trade internationally, and (5) regulation of credit, labor, and business. Research shows that individuals living in countries with high levels of economic freedom enjoy higher levels of prosperity, greater individual freedoms, and longer life spans. The full report is available at www.freetheworld.com It is the hope of The Nassau Institute that The Bahamas Government will focus attention on this extremely valuable tool. Higher levels of economic freedom inevitably lead to economic growth and the creation of wealth. International Rankings Hong Kong offers the highest level of economic freedom worldwide, with a score of 9.01 out of 10. The other top scorers are Singapore (8.68), New Zealand (8.20), Switzerland (8.03), Australia (7.98), Canada (7.81), Chile (7.77), the United Kingdom (7.71), Mauritius (7.67), and the United States (7.60). The rankings and scores of other large economies: Germany, 21st (7.45); Japan, 22nd (7.44); France, 42nd (7.16); Italy, 70th (6.81); Mexico, 75th (6.74); Russia, 81st (6.55); China, 92nd (6.43); India, 94th (6.40); and Brazil, 102nd (6.19). Zimbabwe maintains the lowest level of economic freedom among the 141 jurisdictions measured. Myanmar, Venezuela, Angola, and Democratic Republic of Congo round out the bottom five nations. Several countries have substantially increased their economic freedom scores since 1990. Uganda saw the biggest improvement, climbing to 7.10 this year from 3.00 in 1990, followed by Zambia, which rose to 7.35 from 3.52; Nicaragua, which jumped to 6.76 from 2.96; Albania, which climbed to 7.54 from 4.24; and Peru, which increased to 7.29 from 4.13. Over the same period, economic freedom has steadily regressed in Venezuela, whose score fell to 4.23 from 5.45; Zimbabwe, which dropped to 4.06 from 5.05; the United States, which slipped to 7.58 from 8.43; and Malaysia, which fell to 6.68 from 7.49. The report notes that among the highest-ranked countries, the average income of the poorest 10 per cent of people was $8,735 (in constant 2005 international dollars), compared to a meagre $1,061 for those living in the least economically free countries. On average, the poorest 10 per cent of people in the most economically free countries are nearly twice as rich as the average population of the least economically free nations. About the Economic Freedom Index Economic Freedom of the World measures the degree to which the policies and institutions of countries are supportive of economic freedom. The 2011 report was prepared by James Gwartney, Gus A. Stavros Eminent Scholar Chair at Florida State University; Robert A. Lawson, Southern Methodist University; and Joshua Hall, Beloit College. For more information on the Economic Freedom Network, data sets, and previous Economic Freedom of the World reports, visit www.freetheworld.com Download the 2011 EFW Report (pdf) here...
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comments
Tradewinds - 22 September 2011 06:22- 45 to 40th in rank..
- Thanks Joan.. The issue is simple when given alternatives choices, the Bahamas is far from the top of the list in selecting a business friendly domicile to establish a business..The record speaks for itself.. Nestle, one of the world's largest food companies, closed its western hemisphere headquarters here years ago due to excessive regulations and fees.. HIS, one of the the largest Japanese tour companies, closed its doors several years ago as government fees and regulations drove them to another jurisdiction.. Most have forgotten how we have drove the captive and reinsurance industry to Bermuda because of tax issues.. We maybe 40th but that does not mean very much when structuring new business.. In truth we are not very competitive as a business and financial center..
Joan - 21 September 2011 19:39- prices
- Tradewinds make the case for non-intervention by the state -The high costs of goods and services are associated with the interventionist government, the effect of which idistorts the market.
Indexes are indicators the value of which may be that they are markers for trends. Economic freedom rating for the Bahamas has been between 40 and 50 for some time. Desirable would be a rating between 1 - 10.
Tradewinds - 21 September 2011 14:36- 45 to 40th in rank..
- Oh I how wish it was so.. The Freedom Index is a good attempt at comparative analysis, but it at best is only a PR piece and shows the limits of judgment and understand..
In our Bahamas the basic cost of starting and maintaining a business is at best prohibited and time consuming.. Perhaps the biggest issue I have experienced is the excessive fees and charges which the Bahamian government imposes upon business and private financial institutions.. Licenses for certain financial services can run about $10,000.. In another competing jurisdiction you can establish the identical product for $500.. Work permits are another example were a specific Bahamian work permit costs $3,500 compared to only $100 in Mexico.. Needless to say government fees are a disincentive to business development in the Bahamas..
I could go on and on but what's the use.. I guess I am somewhat glad that we have moved from 45th to the 40th place on the Freedom Index.. But what we really need is a restructuring of private sector fees and taxes in order to attract international business to our shores and encourage domestic capital formation.. Now is the time for such changes to be considered..
Add new comment: