|
$4,482,663,855.82
Recent Comments
Mandatory Staff and Worker Unions For those concerned with the country-s welfare, the Bill and its replacements are scary stuff. It is the Government-s next step in implanting in the private sector the militant trade unionism that has flourished in the worker and managerial ranks of BaTelCo, Bahamasair and BEC (the "3B" unions). Such unions do not exist without Government intervention and support. With the present Industrial Tribunal, this Bill... or its replacements... and several key rulings, an employer will not be able to stop the unionization of his managers or any part of his workforce.
With these changes the Government will bring the "blessings" of "3B" unionism to Sun International, Cable Bahamas, City Markets, Marriott Crystal Palace... but more importantly... to every business whether Bahamian or foreign owned. The country can ill afford mandatory "3B" unionism. Compulsory Arbitration The Industrial Tribunal was created by the FNM to make the arbitration process compulsory and binding rather than voluntary and non-binding. As expected it created "grievance chaser" unionism and Industrial Tribunal Lotto. The proposed Labour Bill will further enhance this costly and divisive process. The Bill will-
So we have lawyers and union representatives chasing workers with imagined and real grievances, avoiding conciliation and hoping to win at Industrial Tribunal Lotto. Observations Mandatory "3B" managerial and worker unions and enhanced "grievance chasing" will escalate the costs of doing business in the Bahamas, reduce the rewards to entrepreneurial risk taking, blunt efforts to increase labour productivity, and ultimately kill economic growth and job creation itself. The Bill has been around a long time... first drafted by the PLP, adopted by the FNM, reviewed by labour, business and government and revised. Yet it remains a fundamentally bad piece of legislation. It is ironic and a shame that the business community has only recently recognized this fact and that the FNM retains it as a pillar of its pre-electoral political agenda. While it may be "good" politics, it is bad economics. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comments
Add new comment: