SEARCH:

search

JOIN OUR NEWSLETTER:

go

Calendar

Bookmark and Share

Thought To Ponder

...The problem has been developing for many years: a sort of economic alcoholism in which society has depended upon government to solve all its problems. Governments have promised to do away with unemployment, to eradicate poverty, to mitigate the pain of old age and sickness, even to ease the consequences of banking and business mistakes. Such irresistible promises! It was exactly what everyone wanted. We became economic alcoholics, dependent on government, and have had no concept of who will pay the price for this happy addiction. (from a speech at Athens College in 1984)
Antony Fisher

 Harmful Tax Competition 
26 July 2001

by 200 Economists including Nobel Laureates 
Milton Friedman and Jim Buchanan

(The following is a letter to President George W. Bush dated May 31, 2001.)


"We, the undersigned economists, urge you to reject the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development's so-called "harmful tax competition" initiative. According to the OECD, it is unfair for low-tax countries to attract jobs, capital and entrepreneurial talent away from high-tax countries. To stop this process, the Paris-based bureaucracy is threatening low-tax nations with financial protectionism unless they change their tax and privacy laws so that high-tax nations can more easily double-tax income that is saved and invested - even when that income is earned in other nations. 


"This is a completely misguided initiative. Tax competition is a liberalizing force in the world economy, something that should be celebrated rather than persecuted. It forces governments to be more fiscally responsible lest they drive economic activity to lower-tax environments. Other reasons for our opposition includes: 

  • "The OECD seeks to create a tax cartel - Consumers benefit and the economy is more efficient when gas stations, banks, pet stores, and car companies compete. The same thing is true for government. Competition promotes efficiency and encourages lawmakers to rationalize public finance.
  • "The OECD is threatening global commerce - Protectionism is a bad idea, and it is a really bad idea when the goal is to interfere with international capital flows. The OECD effort is akin to a high-tax state like California trying to block investment dollars from flowing to a low-tax state like Nevada.
  • "The OECD proposal will boost the underground economy - Instead of propping up non-competitive tax systems, criminalizing tax competition will simply drive taxpayers into the informal economy. A low tax burden, by contrast, will reduce incentives to hide, shelter and under-report income. 
  • "The OECD is defending bad tax policy - In order to minimize tax-induced distortions, the tax code should neither subsidize nor penalize different activities. Yet the OECD initiative is driven by a desire to help high-tax nations double-tax income that is saved and invested.
  • "The OECD will hurt growth in less-developed nations - Penalizing countries for adopting market-friendly tax systems will hinder economic reform and reduce growth rates in the developing world. This may even cause more crime since opportunities for honest employment will shrink.

 
"Mr. President, we ask again that you stop the OECD's ill-conceived project. As the world's largest economy and single largest contributor to the OECD's budget, the United States has the ability to pull the plug on this unwise proposal."

Help support The Nassau Institute

Comments


Add new comment:
Name *
E-mail  
Subject *
Comment *
number
In order to prevent "spam entries", we require that you enter the numerical code in the grey box, as you submit your posting. Thank you for your cooperation.
You may edit it as long as you don't exit your browser. After moderator approval, it will be visible for public.