SEARCH:

search

JOIN OUR NEWSLETTER:

go

Calendar

Bookmark and Share

Thought To Ponder

To the frustrated, freedom from responsibility is more attractive than freedom from restraint. They are eager to barter their independence for relief from the burdens of willing, deciding and being responsible for inevitable failure. They willingly abdicate the directing of their lives to those who want to plan, command and shoulder all responsibility.
Eric Hoffer

 Cuban Ambassador spurns the free market for gasoline 
11 November 2005
The Nassau Institute

The Free Press as a forum for the exchange of differing opinions contributes to constitutional democracy as it creates an appetite for truth. Over time it builds trust in government and institutions.

As a case in point the PetroCaribe issue has attracted numerous suggestions for reducing the cost of gasoline, some of which fail to take into consideration the role of markets in supplying products.

Even the Cuban Ambassador is quoted in a recent Tribune. His recommendation calls for government to purchase fuel from a single supplier and to "eliminate" intermediaries. (Distributors).

In other words the supply of energy to the Bahamas becomes a state run enterprise from top to bottom, eliminating the free market. Bahamians are familiar with state-run enterprise, the high cost and inefficiencies and are therefore unlikely to go along with Mr. Wilson's recommendations.

Effectively, the Cuban Ambassador draws attention to the profound differences between capitalism and markets and Marxist/communism.

Capitalism flourishes on the private property order and individual freedom. Cuba on the other hand denies its citizens the right to own property and severely limits all other freedoms, including speech and travel. It is not therefore surprising that the per capita income in Cuba is $3,000 per annum whilst the average per capita income in The Bahamas is $17,700.

Furthermore Bahamians can travel to their hearts content as their pocket books will permit, and do not require permission from any government autocrat.

The institutions of private property, the free market and the existence of money through the interrelations of supply and demand determine what is supplied and at what price. The supply of energy is no exception.

The Cuban dictator and Hugo Chavez have much in common. Chavez describes his plans for the Caribbean and Latin America as the "new socialism" of the 21st century. To implement his plans at home he has recently increased calls for state officials to take over private land. Soldiers have enforced some of the takeovers, at times denying owners and workers access to their land. (Christian Science Monitor).

It is not therefore surprising that by demagoguery and bad economic policy Chavez has caused 12% of the Venezuelan population to slip into extreme poverty.

The illusion of an all-powerful state producing a beautiful future was the centerpiece of Marxist policy for 70 years; it produced a type of slavery and poverty; and it ended with the fall of the Berlin Wall. Let's not listen to those who want to keep the Marxist illusion alive.

It is highly unlikely that Bahamians will be duped into a Marxist solution hoping to save a few pennies on the price of a gallon of gas.

Such compromise is so offensive to the private property order that no Bahamian should take Mr. Wilson's recommendations seriously.

THE NASSAU INSTITUTE

Help support The Nassau Institute

Comments

Rick Lowe - 10 July 2006 04:55
Cuban Ambassador Spurns Free Market
America is not perfect by and measure, but I wonder why so many Cubans risk their lives to get there.
They desperately want to free themselves from the Cuban dictator and system where only the chosen few have an opportunity.
One good thing about America is that eventually the scams are revealed and the powerful do fall. Does that happen to Castro???
Bahangr - 10 July 2006 04:22
Re: Cuban Ambassador & Gasoline
I would like Mr. Blankenshp to explain the numerous atrocities against the American tax payer through the massive fraud and corruption evident in every US government undertaking from the Star Wars programme to what we are now seeing in the Iraq War and the New Orleans Katrina disaster.

How does this wanton abuse of the labour and future of ordinary Americans figure in fostering freedom?
Ambassador J. Richard Blankenship - 12 November 2005 04:17
Cuban Ambassador & Gasoline
You have outlined a clear as possible so anyone can understand, the differences between capitalism and socialism. The last fifty years have seen democracy defeat nazism, communistism and socialism. Citizens of countries can see this, why then can elected leaders not understand that the right to be free is a God given right and not one that can taken away by man? Government exists to provide opportunities for individuals to excel in what ever endeavor they may choose. Government does not exist to provide jobs, or opportunities for bureaucrats to raid the public treaury at their pleasure.

Add new comment:
Name *
E-mail  
Subject *
Comment *
number
In order to prevent "spam entries", we require that you enter the numerical code in the grey box, as you submit your posting. Thank you for your cooperation.
You may edit it as long as you don't exit your browser. After moderator approval, it will be visible for public.