SEARCH:

search

JOIN OUR NEWSLETTER:

go

Calendar

Bookmark and Share

Thought To Ponder

Whoever claims the right to redistribute the wealth produced by others is claiming the right to treat human beings as chattel.
Ayn Rand, author of Atlas Shrugged.

 Proposed 84.1% NIB Contribution Tax Increase - Not Business as usual! 
11 September 2009
The Nassau Institute

Business is advised to “brace” for an increase of 2% on the payroll tax (aka income tax). The tax rate in 2010 is slated to rise to 10.8%.  The wage ceiling rises from $400.00 to $600.00.

An example of the effect of the increases on a small company with three employees follows:

At the current tax rate of 8.8% on wages with the cap at $400.00 per week the tax is $5,500.00 per annum.  When the wage ceiling is raised from $400.00 to $600.00 and the tax rate increased to 10.8% the annual combined payment to NIB becomes $10,100 per annum; an 84%  increase!

Such an increase will have unintended harmful consequences.

Most Bahamian businesses have already been laying-off employees in line with falling income. The growing numbers of unemployed will join the line-up for Unemployment Insurance, the program government enacted earlier this year in a fit of unsustainable altruism.

The tax increase coupled with the Unemployment Benefits program sets in motion a vicious cycle of tax increases to support the newly unemployed whose numbers increase as a consequence of the previous tax increase.

Does this make sense? Well yes, if a welfare state is a desired end, and government expansion the means to the end.

The unemployed are non-contributors. Increasing unemployment results in a decrease in contributions to NIB. Therefore a tax increase that leads to job loss undermines the objective of the increase intended to guarantee the viability of the Fund in the future.

To increase taxes in a slowing economy takes resources from producers when they are needed most. In the best of times taxes are disincentives for economic expansion, in the worst of times they are destructive to businesses struggling to survive.

The NIB Fund as a ready source for government borrowing is a kind of candy store to indulge the government’s sweet tooth for spending. Perhaps the “ready” money explains
ridiculous amounts spent on projects like the $36,000.00 for each of 6 roundabouts for the Beauty Pageant – if the numbers reported in the press are correct.

Out of debt out of danger is an old proverb that says it all. It applies to personal debt as well as to the liabilities of business and government. The danger to the value of the Bahamian Dollar by the growing debt affects everyone and cannot be ignored. Tax rates and policies that increase costs undermine businesses the major source of income needed  to reduce the debt.

Business is advised to “brace” itself for tax increases yet government exempts itself from responsible actions that would have made a tax increase unnecessary. There is something tragically wrong with that.

THE NASSAU INSTITUTE

September 9th 2009

Help support The Nassau Institute

Comments

Joan - 18 September 2009 23:15
Business as Usual?
The NIB tax and the increase is viewed from the perspective of the increased tax to the State - NIB.
The question of Who pays is another issue -and more complicated.
Rick Lowe - 12 September 2009 11:11
Fuzzy Math
Thank you Greg.
The 84.1% is a combined increase of course.
G.J.Wirth - 12 September 2009 08:14
NIB Premium increases
I recall that the NI showed some years ago the reality of what is evident now - it is broke and is unable to meet its liabilities so what do you think they will do ?

Greg - 12 September 2009 07:27
Fuzzy Math
I do not wish to dispute your other points through the article, but your math is somewhat wrong.

A business is resposible for 5.4% of the 8.8% NIB Contribution (Tax). They are responsible to deduct or collect the employee's 3.4%. The percented increase I understand will be 1% for employer & 1% for employee.

When you redo the math, a business of 3 with all employees making over $600.00 will have an increased NIB expense of $2,620 per annum, which is still a hefty increase.

I am not saying who ever wrote this article was trying to put a deliberate spin on the numbers, but one needs to think through the facts carefully to make sure your opponents do not get the oportunity to spin your own numbers back on you.

Add new comment:
Name *
E-mail  
Subject *
Comment *
number
In order to prevent "spam entries", we require that you enter the numerical code in the grey box, as you submit your posting. Thank you for your cooperation.
You may edit it as long as you don't exit your browser. After moderator approval, it will be visible for public.